back to e-flux.com

On the Social Media Ideology


#1

Scraping the Social: “We are unknown to ourselves—and with good reason.” Friedrich Nietzsche—“Even the retards are starting to figure it out.” (comment)—“In data we trust.” Priceonomics—“The Internet fails to scale gracefully.” Chris Ellis—“I want to be surprised by my own bot”—“There is a crack in everything. That’s how the light gets in.” Leo­­nard Cohen—“Just did my sheepish biannual LinkedIn visit, which felt too much like my sheepish biannual sweeping of dry cleaner hangers into the bin.” Dayo Olopade—Organic Reach Technologies (company)—“It’s not a pilot study. It’s small batch artisanal data.” @AcademicsSay—“No Reply” The Beatles—“A Facebook-Op occurs when one takes a photo just to upload it to Facebook later.” Urban Dictionary—“If you start to think that people are awful, you can always sign on to Twitter. Get some further proof. Then go on about your day.” Nein—“The right people can work around a bad technology, but the wrong people will mess up even a good one.” Kentaro Toyama—“My secrets won’t make you happier.” Amalia Ulman—“You can wake up now, the universe has ended.” Jim Stark—“Stop treating internet like it’s a different thing and start focusing on what you actually want your society to look like. We have to fix society, before we can fix the internet.” Peter Sunde—“We may be decentralised and disagree on a lot of topics amongst ourselves, but operations are always carefully coordinated.” Anonymous—#Apply: The same boiling water that softens potatoes, hardens eggs—“Insults from complete strangers. This is the true promise of social media.” Neil—“How valuable is reputation if any idiot off the street can rate me?” #peeple—Social media or “how to turn our thoughts violently towards the present as it is” (Stuart Hall)—“Man is the master of contradictions.” Thomas Mann.

Contradictory consciousness-management has superseded social anxiety about Bad Faith. This has long been the thesis of Slavoj Žižek. Let’s work on this thesis and take seriously the cynical statement “They know what they do, but they do it anyway” and apply this to social media. There is no longer a need to investigate the potential of “new media” and deconstruct their intentions. The internet has reached its hegemonic stage. In previous decades it was premature to associate intensive 24/7 usage by millions with deep structures such as the (sub)conscious. Now that we live fully in social media times, it has become pertinent to do precisely that: link techne with psyche.

­

The revelations of Edward Snowden arrived long after our daily surf-and-swap routines had become firmly entrenched. We know we’re watched by surveillance systems but who can honesty claim to constantly be aware of them? Artistic masks are promoted as protective face shields—yet who wears them? The internet may be broken, as the phrase goes (and IT engineers have reached a consensus about this troubling analysis), but this cannot be said of social media. Like Snowden’s revelations, Sherry Turkle’s evidence about smartphones inhibiting one’s empathy and ability to enjoy the virtues of solitude have arrived late in the social media game. How hard has it become to confront offline boredom? It’s a straight-up torture.

Read the full article here.


#2

Its seems to me, as Don Herzon wrote in something I read last night that: “no one is so wholly confined within a discourse that creativity, agency, fighting back becomes impossible.” But its a matter to what strategies to take. Maybe we need more analysis of the nature of ideology or hegemony as it pervades social media but maybe we can play. I think there is a sense amongst many of us ‘heavy users’ (Burroughs) that the FBk algos are really another type of nuanced computer games. Misspellings and other contrivances to fox word recognition is one thing that can be taken further. The English internet is still a literary space with all the top down standardisation imposed by the OED. Oral language has another level of ‘grain’ which point to an emotive level of expression, which fitted very well with the (Barthes) with their separation of body and mind, but is sorely missing in internet parlancing. (red dots underneath… I must be getting somewhere)
But to get on to my proposal: That I, or we?, visit the homepage every one of our F
Bk friends and have some kind of interaction so we are not victims of our event feed (with its little ‘world’ symbol to suggest we are getting a stream from out world). What could this algofoxing counter-hegemonic thing be? A blank video with an audio message? Like something stuck in your throat? Any ideas?