back to e-flux.com

e-flux conversations

Donna Haraway on Truth, Technology, and Resisting Extinction


#1

Donna_Haraway_and_Cayenne

The latest issue of Logic magazine has a lengthy interview with lauded feminist scholar and philospher of science Donna Haraway. Haraway discusses the strangely long life of her Cyborg Manifesto, the intellectual blindspots of “Stewart Brand types,” and the heartening revival of socialism in the West. Check out an excerpt from the interview below.

The ideas that you and other feminist philosophers were developing challenged many dominant assumptions about what truth is, where it comes from, and how it functions. More recently, in the era of Trump, we are often told we are living in a time of “post-truth” — and some critics have blamed philosophers like yourselves for creating the environment of “relativism” in which “post-truth” flourishes. How do you respond to that?

Our view was never that truth is just a question of which perspective you see it from. “Truth is perspectival” was never our position. We were against that. Feminist standpoint theory was always anti-perspectival. So was the Cyborg Manifesto, situated knowledges, [the philosopher] Bruno Latour’s notions of actor-network theory, and so on.

“Post-truth” gives up on materialism. It gives up on what I’ve called semiotic materialism: the idea that materialism is always situated meaning-making and never simply representation. These are not questions of perspective. They are questions of worlding and all of the thickness of that. Discourse is not just ideas and language. Discourse is bodily. It’s not embodied, as if it were stuck in a body. It’s bodily and it’s bodying, it’s worlding. This is the opposite of post-truth. This is about getting a grip on how strong knowledge claims are not just possible but necessary — worth living and dying for.

Image of Donna Haraway by Rusten Hogness, CC BY-SA 3.0. Via Wikimedia Commons.