e-flux Conversations has been closed to new contributions and will remain online as an archive. Check out our new platform for short-form writing, e-flux Notes.

e-flux conversations

"Democratic, ecological, gender-liberated society"

"In fact PKK’s new ‘democratic autonomy’ promotes a ‘democratic, ecological, gender-liberated society.’ This egalitarian model is being tested in de-facto autonomous zones known as Rojava Cantons. When we look into details of the Rojava’s constitution, one can identify a deliberate articulation of a desire for a free, socially and ecologically responsible, multicultural, multiethnic democracy. In that regard, if PKK is successful in Syria in establishing and sustaining these cantons, this could very well be a viable model for the Turkish Kurdistan and beyond. Well, that is the problem at least for the AKP government in Turkey.

“The cantons have far-reaching importance, because we can imagine a possibility of a new Middle East. Instead of unitary nationalistic state rules, diverse ethnic and cultural traditions can be represented via networks of democratic enclaves/cantons. As a secular ‘real democracy’ experiment, the Rojava cantons rises as an oasis within the Islamist infected territories. Of course, in order to commonize and localize this model, the idea of democratic autonomy has to be discussed extensively in regard to different contexts. The success of this optimistic model depends on providing the life support that Kobane needs at the moment. The world has to support secular force success against the Islamists in Kobanê. This would be far more effective than a raging war on Islamist terrorists by the US.”


The Constitution of Rojava

1 Like

Balibar on Kobene

1 Like

Rebuilding Kobené - Architecture of the Day After

Is it possible to to build revolution architecturally? What does it mean rebuilding? How we can discuss the architecture of revolution? How we define infrastructure and sustain in accordance with revolutionary ideas among urgent spatial condition. 40 thousand people went back to Kobené. The tents in camps are in the process of reinstallment and shift to Kobene from Suruç. There many ideas about participatory design and radical ecological architecture opinions but does it really solve the urgent condition? How we understand and rebuilt an infrastructure of a demolished city? I was yesterday evening in a dinner with some Kurdish mayors of Artuklu, they propose that the very demolished part should be preserve as memoir of the resistance and battle, that may las to future generation and remind the battle for freedom. Is it romantic to preserv ruins of war?